New Jersey’s New Preschool Standards

Back in Feb. 17, 2012, a paneled discussion at Princeton University’s McCosh Hall was attended by NJ Education Commissioner Chris Cerf. During that conversation, he stated that one of the downfalls of the policies set by No Child Left Behind was inadvertently creating schools that took on the wrong approach to teaching. How teachers taught was of great concern. Across the nation, educators were found teaching to the test and drill-and-kill teaching. As part of the Common Core educational reform, goals are set at the federal level but educators at the local level are not told how to achieve the standards set by the Common Core. For early learners like kindergarteners, play is welcomed as the approach to teaching.

The Standards define what all students are expected to know and be able to do, not how teachers should teach. For instance, the use of play with young children is not specified by the Standards, but it is welcome as a valuable activity in its own right and as a way to help students meet the expectations in this document.

New Jersey Department of Education echoes this sentiment in both math and language arts. In the document entitled Teacher Practices Related To Common Core State Standards For Mathematics, the NJ DOE states “ Encourage children to count to 100 through daily routines (e.g., games which involve counting played in small groups; “Let’s see if 100 steps will take us all the way to the playground.”).” In the document entitled, Teacher Practices Related To Kindergarten Common Core State Standards For English Language Arts, the DOE states,

In kindergarten, teachers need to capitalize on the active and the social nature of kindergarteners and their instructional needs to include rich demonstrations, interactions, and models of literacy during projects and play activities that make sense to five and six year-old children.

Having recently completed a student teaching experience at a New Jersey charter school, I have come to realize that not all kindergarten teachers approach early learning from a play-based perspective. Worksheets dominate the classroom setting and testing is regularly administered to kindergarteners. Participating in student teaching, field studies and practicums in charter and traditional public schools, others pursuing elementary and early education certification found paper and pencil driven instruction, too. While it is highly possible that I experienced an aberration in charter education, the experience may be indicative of the state of charter school education. In 2008, William Paterson University found that kindergartens across New Jersey’s Abbot districts, where most charter schools serve, are engaged in the kind of teaching Commissioner Cerf denounced.

With Common Core standards, comes increased responsibility to ensure that children, even our youngest learners, meet standards. NJ DOE has a draft of standards for preschool. The draft states “Give children opportunities to see connections in fun and playful ways. Tap into children’s passion and enthusiasm and build on it (e.g., a child who is interested in spiders can read about them, play games about them, observe them, draw them, and write stories about them).” The state of New Jersey has set standards for math and language arts in public preschools.

An example of mathematics standard Represent addition and subtraction by manipulating up to 5 objects: (a) putting together and adding to (e.g., “3 blue pegs, 2 yellow pegs, 5 pegs altogether.”); and (b) taking apart and taking from (“I have 4 carrot sticks. I’m eating one. Now I have 3.”).
An example of language arts standard a) Print many alphabet letters. b) Use frequently occurring nouns and verbs. c) Form regular plural nouns. d) Understand and use question words (e.g., who, what, where, when, why, how). e) Use frequently occurring prepositions (e.g., to, from, in, out, on, off, for, by, with). f) Begin to speak in complete sentences.

These standards, designed for public preschools, will very likely permeate the state of New Jersey, but the approach to reaching these standards will vary greatly. Educators fear how teachers will teach to these standards. They fear worksheets, drill and kill teaching, and teaching to the standards will become the approach of choice for many  preschools.

Montessori preschools since its inception have had an approach to early childhood much in line with Common Core’s promotion of using play to teach. However, Montessori teachers do not call it play, they call it work. Tim Seldin, President of Montessori Foundation, shares the philosophies of Montessori preschools.

What to Expect When You’re Expecting Bilingual Children

On May 13, 2013, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill released a report on dual language learners, Dual Language Learners: Research Informing Policy. The university has a special project, Center for Early Care and Education Research- Dual Language Learners (CECER-DLL), funded by the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation which is a part of the United States Office of Administration for Children and Families. It focuses on dual language learners age birth to 5, their families, learning environments in early care and education center-based programs, home-based child care providers, and Head Start and Early Head Start Programs.

Even before the release of the report, some states, like Massachusetts, have dedicated policies towards young dual language learners. However, many school districts across the United States still utilize standardized questions that are geared for monolingual children when addressing dual language learning needs. Educators, concerned with the possibility that a dual language learner child might need federal IDEA educational supports, use questions that date to the 1970s to find out if a child requires special services. One form provided by a public school district asks parents to check Yes or No to “Speech is not clear enough to be understood”. According to the report, for dual language learners under the age of 5, that is very likely the case, because the sounds of two or more language systems influence speech.

With regard to phonological abilities, as infants DLLs’ are behind monolinguals, but then make significant progress during the preschool years, and eventually, reach the same skill level as their monolingual English speaking peers during the early grades.

Another question the form asks is “What language is generally spoken at home?” While the spoken language may be one thing, the child’s exposure to media may show a completely different picture. The popular website, pbskids.com, has video games like Pinata Party featuring Curious George and The Man with the Yellow Hat. Apparently, El Hombre del Sombrero Amarillo is now bilingual. Because of resource issues, financial and available personnel, some public schools will assess dual language learners in English only. This is where things break down dramatically for preschoolers, because, according to the report, their English vocabulary cannot be comparable to that of monolingual English speakers.

Also, while DLLs’ vocabularies in their individual languages are smaller than monolinguals’ when conceptual vocabularies in both languages are combined, DLLs’ vocabularies are often equal to that of monolinguals.

CECER-DLL released a report in June 2012 that explains in more detail how to properly assess a dual language leaner, Examining the use of Language and Literacy Assessments with Young Dual Language Learners. They recommended assessments in both languages spoken at home, and they test on whether or not a child can understand what is said to them (receptive vocabulary). Expressive vocabulary (what a child says) is also assessed, but it is very likely that a young dual language learner is in what is termed the Silent Period, a duration when there is no talking.

…dual-language approach in which DLLs were assessed in both languages for at least one area of language or literacy development, irrespective of language proficiency or dominance. The most frequent area of development assessed in both the home language and in English was receptive vocabulary.

They also utilized input from parents to allow the assessors to get a better understanding of which language to focus on.

Studies used parent and teacher/caregiver report of children’s language in various ways, including as background information on language exposure, as an initial step, or as sole criterion in determining language of assessment.

They endorsed assessments that scored on how well a child has a concept not vocabulary. These assessments come in a few forms. One type, the assessors present flashcards with different pictures and use a specific word in either of the two language to ask a child to identify a picture from the group of pictures. Some other language neutral tests introduce new vocabulary in either language while presenting a picture that depicts the new word. Then the assessor asks the child to either repeat it or be able to identify the new word amongst a set of flashcards.

In measuring children’s knowledge of concepts rather than vocabulary in a particular language, conceptual scoring would usually present a more valid assessment of children’s knowledge.

Educators who do not believe that dual language learners develop language skills differently from monolingual children will find the most recent release from University of North Carolina to be an eye opener.

Dr. Alejandro Brice, 2012-2014 Chair, ASHA Multicultural Issues Board, Dr. Mahchid Namazi, Assistant Professor at Kean University and Patricia Murray, M.A., LDT/C, Advocate and Educational Consultant Educational Resources for Success, LLC , share their knowledge of how children become bilingual.